Revelstoke City Council defeated the proposed Development Cost Charge Bylaw, meaning the original bylaw made in 2008 still stands. (Black Press File Photo)

Revelstoke City Council defeats proposed Development Cost Charge Bylaw

Revelstoke City Council defeated second reading of the proposed Development Cost Charge bylaw today, which means that there will be no changes to the bylaw and the current Development Cost Charges are still in affect.

READ MORE: City DCC reserves dwindle while review delayed

City council began the process to upgrade the current Development Cost Charge Bylaw, which was made in 2008, in April.

The purpose of the bylaw is to allow the city to charge developers for and use the money to assist in paying for new infrastructure that is a result of increased population, such as roads, sewer and water, instead of that burden falling only on existing taxpayers.

READ MORE: Revelstoke citizen group starts petition asking for deferral of Development Cost Charge bylaw decision

A report was done by McElhanney Consulting looking at factors such as predicted population growth as well as necessary infrastructure projects to come up with recommended numbers for the new bylaw.

However, the numbers presented to council were significantly lower than the numbers recommended by the consulting company. And though the bylaw passed first reading, council requested that city staff remove infrastructure projects in order to further decrease the charges.

READ MORE: Cost to Revelstoke taxpayers as well as developers affected by proposed bylaw

The numbers presented today were again lower than previously recommended, as city staff had removed four projects from the docket, therefor decreasing the total amount of money needed and reducing the charges.

Mark McKee, Gary Sulz and Linda Nixon voted in favour of second reading, Aaron Orlando, Trevor English and Connie Brothers voted against. Scott Duke was not at the meeting.

*Correction notice: It was not a majority of councillors that were against the bylaw but rather the vote was split, which results in defeat.

Revelstoke Development Cost Charges 2008 by Revelstoke Editor on Scribd


 

@JDoll_Revy
jocelyn.doll@revelstokereview.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Just Posted

$224.5 million announced for Highway 1 bridge replacement in Sicamous

Transportation Minister Claire Trevena says bridge option will be announced next month

CSRD wants immediate Provincial action to fund Newsome Creek study

Erosion along the creek is causing hazardous situation for residents

The proportional representation debate continues as the deadline nears

Sean Graham creator of the Dual Member Proportional system says it would be better for Revelstoke

Weekend weather update: Crisp and sunny

This weekend will see lots of sunshine and below season temperatures for the Okanagan, Shuswap and Similkameen.

Canada’s health system commendable overall but barriers to care remain: UN

The United Nations says Canada’s health care system is “commendable” overall but vulnerable groups still face barriers to quality care.

Unique technology gives children with special needs more independent play

UVic’s CanAssist refined seven prototypes aided by $1.5M government contribution

Kelly Ellard’s boyfriend has statutory release revoked

Darwin Duane Dorozan had several parole infractions that found him ‘unmanageable’

Okanagan volunteers reflect on building classrooms in Nepal

Through the charity Her International, the volunteer group built four classrooms

Accident north of Vernon involves SUV and semi truck

Minor delays reported in Highway 97 crash

Ontario driver rolls car in Okanagan

Crash near Vernon follows reports of erratic driving

Doctor’s note shouldn’t be required to prove you’re sick: poll

70% of Canadians oppose allowing employers to make you get a sick note

German-born B.C. man warns against a ‘yes’ vote on proportional representation

Agassiz realtor Freddy Marks says PR in his home country shows party elites can never be voted out

Most Read